独董与其他高管的公司治理作用有差异吗?——基于政治关联与审计契约视角的检验
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金委资助项目(70702018、71272227)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以2007—2011年A股非金融保险业上市公司为样本,从政治关联与审计契约角度揭示独立董事与其他高管在公司治理中的差异。研究发现:在审计师选择方面,独立董事存在政治关联的企业倾向于选择高质量的审计服务,其他高管存在政治关联的企业倾向于选择低质量的审计服务。结合对审计费用考察发现,其他高管存在政治关联的企业选择较低质量审计服务的同时却支付相对较高的审计费用,但又并没有支付显著高于独立董事存在政治关联的企业选择高质量审计服务时支付的审计费用。

    Abstract:

    By using 2007—2011 A share listed non financial insurance industry as a sample, we divide the political connections into different types of independent directors political connections and other executives political connections according to the types of executives and find the different role of corporate governance between the independent directors and the other executives from the perspective of political connections and the audit contract. We show that companies with independent director political connections tend to choose high quality audit services, and companies with other executive political connections tend to choose low quality audit services. We also show that companies with other executive political connections tend to choose a lower quality audit services but pay relatively higher audit fees, and do not pay significantly higher than the companies with independent director political connections. Therefore, the study indicates that independent directors tend to use “supporting hand” of political connections to play a role in corporate governance while other executives tend to use the “grabbing hand”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘颖斐,陈亮.独董与其他高管的公司治理作用有差异吗?——基于政治关联与审计契约视角的检验[J].审计与经济研究test,2015,30(1):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: