产权性质、会计-税收差异与审计收费——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    ]通过考察注册会计师对审计服务定价时是否考虑会计利润与应纳税所得额之间差异(以下简称“会计-税收差异”)所包含的财务信息,研究发现会计-税收差异与审计收费显著正相关。进一步区分产权性质后发现,对于国有控股上市公司来说,会计-税收差异与审计收费正相关,但这种相关性并不显著;而对于民营上市公司来说,会计-税收差异与审计收费显著正相关。研究结果表明,会计-税收差异会影响注册会计师对审计风险的判断,进而通过增加审计程序来降低审计风险,提高审计收费。且在审计定价时,对于不同产权性质的公司,注册会计师差别对待了会计-税收差异中所包含的信息。

    Abstract:

    The article mainly makes a survey of whether CPA would consider the financial information which includes the differences between accounting profits and taxable income when they set up a price on audit service (hereinafter referred to as “BTD”). The study found that BTD has a positive effect on audit fees. Further study also shows that for state owned listed companies, BTD is uncorrelated to audit fees. And for the private listed companies, BTD is significantly positively related to audit fees. The results show that BTD has an effect on CPAs judgment about audit risk, which further increases the audit procedures to reduce audit risks, and improve audit fees. What is more, with respect to audit fees, CPA takes different attitude towards BTD in state owned listed companies and the private listed companies respectively.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

程昔武,张泽云,纪纲.产权性质、会计-税收差异与审计收费——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].审计与经济研究test,2016,31(5):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-09-08
  • 出版日期: