我国保险公司风险与资本比例关系的实证研究——基于2SLS和2SQR的方法
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDA043);中国特色社会主义经济建设协同创新中心和江苏省优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用中国大陆地区30家寿险公司和13家财险公司在2006—2013年的数据,运用两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)和两阶段分位数回归法(2SQR),对比研究了我国保险公司的资本比例、承保风险和投资风险之间的关系。研究发现:我国保险公司的风险水平对资本比例无显著的影响,资本比例对承保风险、投资风险均有显著负向影响,说明我国保险公司风险与资本之间的传导机制还未完全形成,偿付能力体系的发挥将会限制;通过2SLS和2SQR的对比发现,2SLS无法完全解释风险与资本比例关系。进一步的研究发现:寿险公司和财险公司在资本比例与风险关系上有很大的区别,说明有针对性的监管会提高监管的有效性。最后,针对我国保险业的风险管理和偿付能力监管提出了相关建议。

    Abstract:

    Whether property insurers or casualty insurers, risk management is an important point for insurance industry to guarantee healthy operation, the theoretical basis of risk management lies in the important relation between risks and capital ratio. This paper studies the relationship between capital ratio, underwriting risks and investment risks of property and casualty insurers from year 2006 to 2013 according to the use of 2SLS and 2SQR.The empirical results showed that the risk had no significant effect on the capital ratio, but the capital had significant negative effect on the underwriting risks and investment risks. It indicated that transmission mechanism of risk and capital in insurance companies had not yet fully formed, it would limit the play of solvency regulation system. Through the comparison of SLS and 2SQR, it revealed the reason why 2SLS couldnt fully explain the relationship between capital and risks. We also found that there were big differences between property insurers and casualty insurers on relation of capital ratio and risks by further study, indicating that targeted regulation would improve the effectiveness of supervision. At last, this paper proposed some suggestions on risks management and solvency regulation system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙武军,崔皓月.我国保险公司风险与资本比例关系的实证研究——基于2SLS和2SQR的方法[J].审计与经济研究,2017,(1):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-01-05
  • 出版日期: