审计风险、审计师个人的经验与审计质量
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(71502108);上海市晨光项目(14CG58);上海高校青年教师培养资助计划(ZZLX15001)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以审计师个人的签字经验来衡量审计师个人的经验,以亏损、重大会计差错更正、因会计问题被监管部门处罚来反映客户的审计风险,以非标意见来衡量审计质量。研究发现:第一,审计师个人的经验越丰富,审计师个人更可能对高审计风险客户出具非标意见,而且以上关系仅体现于项目负责人上;第二,会计师事务所为高审计风险客户配置经验更加不丰富的审计师个人,支持审计师个人的风险规避假说。进一步发现:审计师个人通过为其他客户提供审计服务形成的经验发挥作用。项目负责人经验发挥的积极作用主要体现在小所中,但是小所并没有为高审计风险客户配置经验丰富的审计师个人。

    Abstract:

    Identifying and responding to audit risk is vital to audit theory and practice.Based on the responses to audit risk by improving audit quality,this study aims to answer two related research questions.Firstly,can experienced auditor partners do better jobs on risk response?Secondly,can audit firm allocate audit partners accordingly?This study measures auditor partners experience by their signing experience,audit risk using loss,accounting restatement,and regulatory punishment for accounting issues,and audit quality using modified audit opinion.The main findings are as follows:firstly,experienced auditor partners are more likely to issue modified audit opinion on the higher audit risk clients,mainly among audit managers;secondly,audit firm allocate less experienced auditor partners on the higher audit risk clients.Therefore,we draw the conclusions that experienced audit managers are good at responding to audit risk,but audit firms dont allocate auditor partners accordingly.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

韩维芳.审计风险、审计师个人的经验与审计质量[J].审计与经济研究,2017,(3):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-04-25
  • 出版日期: