决策权分配与投资策略选择——来自中国开放式基金的证据
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目(14FJL002);教育部人文社会科学一般项目(15YJA630073);广东省自然科学基金项目(2015A030313381);广州市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目(15G21)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    决策权分配与效率是组织行为研究的重要问题。通过比较决策权集中的单独管理基金和决策权分散的团队管理基金的投资策略差异,提供开放式基金决策权分配结果的证据。研究发现:团队管理基金有显著为正的选股业绩,单独管理基金表现出在股票和债券间配置组合资产的市场择时能力。研究还发现:团队管理基金没有市场择时能力是由于协调成本高;团队管理基金的专业化收益不能完全弥补其协调成本,而单独管理基金的择时收益则能够弥补其专业化的不足;多任务管理进一步影响决策权分配和投资策略的选择。单独管理基金的经理如同时管理其他偏股型基金时择时能力最突出,团队管理基金的经理如有多任务管理则其选股业绩不显著。

    Abstract:

    Allocation of decision right and efficiency of decision making has been important issues of organization behavior study.In this paper,by comparing investment strategy of sole managed funds with centralized decision right and team managed funds with the decentralized decision right,we provide evidence on consequence of allocation of decision right.This paper found that team managed funds have a significant positive stock selectivity performance,and the sole managed funds also show a significant market timing ability in the portfolio asset allocation between stocks and bonds.Team managed fund absent of significant market timing ability is caused by the high coordination cost.For team managed funds,its specialization benefits cant make up for the coordination costs.For sole managed funds,its market timing benefit can make up for the inadequacy of its specialization.Multi tasks management further affects the relationship between allocation of decision right and investment strategy selection.Managers of sole managed funds,which managing other funds with similar investment objection at the same time,show timing ability in most outstanding,while managers of team managed funds who engaged in multi tasks management,show an insignificant stock selectivity performance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭文平.决策权分配与投资策略选择——来自中国开放式基金的证据[J].审计与经济研究,2017,(3):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-04-25
  • 出版日期: