公司章程反收购条款设置、治理风险与审计费用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL060)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着股权分置改革后敌意收购事件频发,众多上市公司纷纷在公司章程中设置反收购条款。现有文献尚缺乏从外部监督者视角讨论审计师如何看待公司章程反收购条款的研究。基于中国资本市场反收购实践,手工收集2009—2019年A股上市公司章程反收购条款数据,实证研究公司章程反收购条款设置对审计费用的影响。实证结果表明:公司章程反收购条款设置中的管理层自我保护性防御增加了治理风险,提高了审计费用。机制检验表明:公司章程反收购条款设置通过加剧代理冲突和信息不对称增加了审计风险与成本,进而提高审计费用,而并非反收购条款设置后的审计意见购买。考察截面上的差异性后发现,公司章程反收购条款提高审计费用的现象在市场化程度较低和法律环境较差的地区、内部控制质量较低的公司中更显著。考察审计费用增加后的经济后果发现,审计师能够通过增加自身努力提高目标企业的会计信息质量,并且资本市场整体对审计费用的增加表现为审计质量信号。从审计定价角度研究审计师对公司章程反收购条款设置的反应,丰富了反收购条款经济后果和审计费用影响因素的研究,为审计师有效降低执业风险和上市公司合理设置章程条款提供了新的经验证据。

    Abstract:

    With the frequent hostile takeover events after the split share structure reform, many listed companies have set up anti takeover provisions in their articles of association. The existing literature is still lack of research on how auditors view the anti takeover provisions of the articles of association from the perspective of external supervisors. Based on the practice of anti takeover in Chinas capital market, this paper manually collects the data of anti takeover provisions in the articles of association of A share listed companies from 2009 to 2019, and empirically studies the impact of anti takeover provisions in the articles of association on audit fees. The empirical results show that the management’s self protective defense in the anti takeover clauses of the company’s articles of association increases governance risks and audit costs; The mechanism test shows that the setting of anti takeover provisions in the articles of association increases the audit risk and cost by aggravating agency conflict and information asymmetry, and then increases the audit expenses, rather than the purchase of audit opinions after the setting of anti takeover provisions. After examining the cross sectional differences, it is found that the relationship between the anti takeover provisions of the articles of association and the improvement of audit fees is more significant in the companies with poor marketization, poor legal environment and low internal control governance. Examining the economic consequences of the increase of audit fees, it is found that auditors can improve the quality of accounting information of the target enterprise by increasing their own efforts, and the increase of audit fees in the capital market as a whole is a signal of audit quality. From the perspective of audit pricing, this paper studies the auditors’ response to the setting of anti takeover provisions in the articles of association, enriches the research on the economic consequences of anti takeover provisions and the influencing factors of audit fees, and provides new empirical evidence for auditors to effectively reduce their practice risk and listed companies to reasonably set up articles of association.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁春生,牛世魁.公司章程反收购条款设置、治理风险与审计费用[J].审计与经济研究,2022,(2):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-03
  • 出版日期: